Mechanical recycling is more climate-compatible than chemical recycling

In the context of the EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive (PPWD), Eunomia, a British consulting firm, determined the recyclate quantities in packaging that must come as outputs from chemical or mechanical recycling.

A research team from the Oeko-Institut has calculated the environmental impacts of this scenario and presented the findings in the study “Climate impact of pyrolysis of waste plastic packaging in comparison with reuse and mechanical recycling”, commissioned by Zero Waste Europe (ZWE) and the Rethink Plastic alliance.

  Treating residues from mechanical recycling with pyrolysis
© Öko-Institut e.V.

Treating residues from mechanical recycling with pyrolysis
© Öko-Institut e.V.

Mechanical recycling should be given legal preference over pyrolysis

Chemical recycling (in this case, pyrolysis) of plastic waste produces much higher greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and losses of material than mechanical recycling.

More mechanical recycling, combined with a 20 % reduction of packaging, would cut GHG emissions by almost half (45 %) compared to chemical recycling, especially pyrolysis. Mechanical recycling should therefore be further promoted and given legal preference over pyrolysis wherever possible.

 

Treating residues from mechanical recycling with pyrolysis

An opportunity lies in the combination of the two: here, residues from mechanical recycling are converted into recyclate via pyrolysis and follow-up processes. The use of this recyclate in plastic products avoids the manufacture of primary plastics from crude oil, thus offering additional GHG reductions. Assuming a shift of 30 % from chemical to mechanical recycling, this reduction amounts to a 61 % higher contribution to climate change mitigation.

 

Pyrolysis is GHG-intensive and causes resource losses

Based on the figures used in the study, GHG emissions from pyrolysis are nine times higher than from mechanical recycling of plastic waste. A further problem with pyrolysis is that over half of the carbon in plastic is lost in the process and has to be replaced by new plastic. This impedes the development of a circular economy.

Climate impact of pyrolysis of waste plastic packaging in comparison with reuse and mechanical recycling: Oeko-Institut study

www.oeko.de/en/


Related articles:

Issue 04/2022 Rethinking is not enough

Development status of plastics recycling

1 Introduction The global production of plastics rose from 130 million tonnes per year (Mta) in 1990 to 460 Mta in 2019. That is a 2.5-fold increase. The percentage of secondary plastic, i.e....

more

Better recycling of plastic packaging: new process extracts fragrances

What doesn't smell good is hard to recycle. This simple rule also applies to the growing volume of plastic waste worldwide. One way to recycle it in an environmentally compatible and climate-friendly...

more

GreenDot and Synextra join forces to address the global plastic recycling challenge

GreenDot and Synextra announced a strategic combination in both Italy and Europe to further expand and combine their knowledge and capabilities for the plastics recycling markets. The collaboration...

more

Establishing highly refined plastic packaging waste streams

Plastics Recyclers Europe releases guidance on quality sorting of plastic packaging Plastic packaging represents the biggest share of the European plastic demand1, and consequently, of the waste that...

more
Issue 03/2022 Chemical Recycling of mixed plastic waste

Coperion supplies twin screw extruder to Ghent University

Plastic waste, especially packaging waste, is generally a mixture of materials with a high degree of contamination. Recycling this raw material is usually difficult, as sorting and cleaning of waste...

more